The Ancestral Puebloan "Et Al" site, nestled amidst the dense piñon and juniper woodlands of Cedar Mesa in southeastern Utah, offers a profound glimpse into a sophisticated past. Archaeologists have uncovered evidence of a vibrant community that thrived here until the early 1200s, featuring a two-story "great house" reminiscent of the monumental architecture found in New Mexico’s renowned Chaco Canyon. Alongside this central dwelling, the site boasts two kivas—subterranean ceremonial chambers vital to Puebloan spiritual life—shrines, and other intricate architectural features that speak to a complex social and religious structure. Further north, the "Owens site" presents another impressive "great house," distinguished by an even larger "great kiva," a communal gathering place for major ceremonies and community events. These pueblos, significantly grander and more elaborately constructed than other contemporary structures in the region, suggest they served as pivotal gathering hubs for the broader Cedar Mesa community, drawing people from surrounding settlements for trade, ceremony, and social interaction.

What’s destroying Utah’s monuments

Radiating outwards from both the Et Al and Owens sites, enigmatic linear swales, clearly human-built, stretch for more than a mile across the landscape in remarkably straight lines. While their precise function remains a subject of archaeological debate, these ancient "roads" are widely believed to be ceremonial or symbolic pathways. They likely served not only to physically link communities, fostering interaction and cohesion, but also to forge spiritual connections to sacred mountains, prominent landforms, and celestial alignments, weaving human settlements into the fabric of the natural and cosmological world. The enduring significance of these pathways is underscored by the discovery of Hopi pottery dating from the 1400s—centuries after the Ancestral Puebloans departed Cedar Mesa. Found along the Et Al "roads," this pottery provides poignant evidence that descendants returned to visit and honor their ancestors’ homeland, maintaining a multi-generational bond with this sacred landscape. These ancient "roads" unequivocally demonstrate that these structures cannot be isolated from their broader cultural and natural context; they are an inextricable part of the region’s deep and enduring heritage.

This intricate tapestry of history, culture, and natural beauty forms the heart of Bears Ears National Monument. In 2016, responding to the urgent pleas of five sovereign tribal nations with profound ancestral ties to the region—the Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation, and the Pueblo of Zuni—President Barack Obama exercised his authority under the 1906 Antiquities Act to establish the landscape-scale monument. This landmark designation protected not only thousands of archaeological sites like Et Al and Owens but also the vast surrounding lands, recognizing their holistic cultural and ecological value. However, the monument’s protective status became a flashpoint in subsequent political battles over public lands and resource extraction.

What’s destroying Utah’s monuments

During his presidency, Donald Trump initiated a controversial campaign to significantly curtail the size of both Bears Ears and the nearby Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. His administration ultimately reduced Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante by approximately 90% each, effectively removing protections from over 2.9 million acres of public lands. This unprecedented reduction encompassed nearly all of Cedar Mesa, leaving the Et Al and Owens sites vulnerable to potential degradation. These cuts represented a far more drastic reduction than initial proposals, signaling a clear shift in federal land management policy.

At Grand Staircase-Escalante, the Trump administration excised 1.69 million acres from national monument status. This decision immediately revived the contentious prospect of coal mining on previously leased areas within the fossil-rich Kaiparowits Plateau, a geological treasure trove known for its significant dinosaur discoveries. Furthermore, the rollback opened the door for renewed uranium extraction in the historically significant Circle Cliffs mining district and expanded opportunities for oil and gas drilling across vast stretches of the once-protected area. Beyond facilitating resource extraction, the administration also relaxed restrictions on motorized vehicle use, vegetation clearing, and livestock grazing within the significantly diminished remaining portions of both monuments, further altering the delicate ecological balance of these sensitive desert environments.

What’s destroying Utah’s monuments

The Trump administration’s order also summarily terminated the Bears Ears Commission, compounding the assault on conservation and tribal sovereignty. This groundbreaking commission, a first-of-its-kind initiative, comprised representatives from the five tribal nations who had been instrumental in developing the monument’s original management plan, embodying a crucial step towards co-management and self-determination for Indigenous communities. In a move widely interpreted as a deliberate affront to tribal sovereignty, federal agencies subsequently removed the five tribes’ seals from official signage at the remaining fragments of Bears Ears, a symbolic act that underscored the White House’s perceived hostility towards Indigenous self-governance and cultural recognition.

The legal basis for these proclamations rested on an expansive interpretation of the 1906 Antiquities Act, which grants presidents the power to designate federal land to protect "historic or scientific interest" objects. However, legal scholars and conservation advocates widely argue that the Act does not explicitly empower a president to rescind or substantially reduce an established national monument; that authority, they contend, is reserved solely for Congress. This fundamental legal question has ignited a flurry of lawsuits filed by tribal nations, environmental organizations, and conservation groups, all seeking to challenge